Making Sure the ‘Great Wealth Transfer’ Doesn’t Turn Into the ‘Great Client Exodus’

Danielle WalkerOver the next 20 years, the industry’s great wealth transfer is expected to put more than $84 trillion in the hands of new family members and other beneficiaries as Baby Boomers increasingly enter their 80s. This large migration of assets could also signal a great client exodus for advisors, if they aren’t able to connect with the new stewards of this wealth.

The transition marks a critical shift in wealth management, with 41% of U.S. advisors saying the generational transfer poses an existential threat to their practice, an April survey published by Natixis Investment Managers found.

Of note, advisors said they retain assets 72% of the time when inheritance passes to a spouse, but that figure drops to 50% when assets move to next-generation heirs, the report said.

Among U.S. individual investors who were polled and expect to inherit assets, almost half (47%) said they do not plan to retain the advisor of their spouse or parents, according to the survey.

Rethinking AUM Minimums

Marguerita Cheng, CEO of Blue Ocean Global Wealth, says the wealth management industry could be doing itself a disservice by focusing too much on asset minimums during these critical transitions — especially when working with first-generation wealth builders.

Advisory firms may too often get caught up in AUM growth, and not how they can continue to preserve wealth within families, she explained.

Cheng notes that many advisors can have concerns about how to tell someone that they don’t meet the practice’s minimum assets requirement.

“I would encourage people to instead start conversations and see if there’s ways you can engage (younger family members). I understand that many of us get paid by assets under management, and some firms penalize people with low assets. But talk to your manager or sales team,” about how you can educate these relatives, she suggested.