Why Tax Losses Are Only Part of the Investment Return Story

Over many years of educating investors about direct indexing, we have noticed a common misunderstanding—conflating the economic value of harvested losses with the investment return on the performance statement. Here’s why those values are not the same thing.

What does it mean to have economic value?

The value of investment return is delivered and can be measured every second of every trading day. By contrast, the value of harvested tax losses is not immediate.

For example, a loss harvested in the early April market sell-off cannot be used until tax returns for 2025 are filed—at least eight months later. And the investor’s circumstances will determine whether the loss can be deployed. If not, it will be carried forward for another 12 months, when circumstances will again dictate usage. And so on, year by year.

In this light, capital losses can be viewed as an asset on the balance sheet of the investor, in the same way that accounts receivable are an asset on the balance sheet of a corporation. In other words, a capital loss is an expectation of monetary value to be received in the not too distant future.

Following this line of thought, remember that the dollar amount of accounts receivable is booked at face value for accounting purposes, but the actual value received may be less than expected or may never even materialize. Likewise with harvested losses, the actual value depends on factors such as the investor’s federal and state tax bracket that year and the availability of capital gains of the same character as the capital losses realized.

Understanding how tax law may affect the economic value of harvested losses can help advisors not only craft and individualize their tax planning services better, but also provide greater clarity in their communication with investors.