Tariffs Complicate the Fed’s Inflation Fight

Tariffs Complicate the Fed’s Inflation Fight

A continued escalation in the Middle East, where the Iranian-backed Houthis joined the conflict in an attempt to disrupt Saudi Arabian crude shipments that pass through the Red Sea via the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait, drove oil prices higher, while new tariff announcements and Alphabet's earnings release created headwinds for equities. Despite broadly positive earnings releases and initial jobless claims falling to their lowest level since 1969, the S&P 500 declined 0.61 percent and ended slightly lower for the second straight week.

The microeconomic backdrop is increasingly bumping up against a shifting macroeconomic environment. Over the past few years, as we have noted, parts of the U.S. economy and financial markets have been harmed by the impact of higher interest rates implemented to stem the inflation that resulted from the COVID-19-era monetary and fiscal policy largesse. Despite this reality, the U.S. economy has continued to move higher—albeit in a bifurcated manner—rather than cascade into an overall economic contraction. When large parts of the economy wobbled, artificial intelligence (AI) came to the rescue as companies spent at virtually any cost to bring the technology to life, and higher-income consumers benefited from the wealth effect created by stocks tied to the AI theme. Importantly, this capital spending boom was initially financed through free cash flow, making it largely noncyclical because it was not directly impacted by higher interest rates.

Over the past few months, however, this narrative has evolved as the costs required to bring AI to life have continued to skyrocket. Many of the previously free-cash-flow-positive companies are now tapping capital markets—both debt and equity—to fund increased spending. Look no further than Alphabet, which announced strong earnings but increased its capital spending to an astounding $205 billion for 2026 while posting its first negative free-cash-flow quarter since going public in 2004. Not surprisingly, the company has issued roughly $60 billion in debt since late 2025 and, in June 2026, announced an $80 billion equity raise to help fund its AI expenditures. We believe this marks an important shift. These companies, and the AI build-out more broadly, now increasingly rely on external capital to fund ever-growing investments, making them more economically sensitive as higher interest rates increase the cost of capital. The rising expense also raises questions about whether companies deploying AI will realize benefits quickly enough to justify continued spending.

This is where inflation—and the question of what the Federal Reserve may do to subdue it—becomes incredibly important. Rising oil prices are often considered outside the Fed’s purview and are generally viewed as shocks the U.S. central bank is willing to “look through” or characterize as transitory. However, we do not believe this is a normal environment, particularly given that inflation has remained above the Fed’s 2 percent target for 63 consecutive months.

The reality is that throughout much of this period, the Fed has described the causes of elevated inflation as transitory or the result of supply shocks—think COVID, tariffs, the Russia-Ukraine war, and now the conflict in the Middle East. Perhaps these events are transitory in isolation, but the question we have heard many Fed officials pose, including Chair Kevin Warsh, is this: At what point do these recurring transitory shocks accumulate into enough sustained inflation pressure that consumers and businesses begin to price, negotiate, and make decisions with inflation in mind? If that occurs, inflation could become increasingly embedded in the U.S. economy.

See more: Inflation Data, Early Earnings and Geopolitics Shape the Market Outlook