After the Election: What Matters for Your Clients’ Portfolios

After the Election: What Matters for Your Clients’ Portfolios

Key Takeaways

  • Lower yields would offer the broadest benefit across assets if inflation and policy risks ease while growth holds up. A decline driven by weaker growth would carry a different message.
  • AI’s long-term opportunity can remain intact even as individual investments differ. Our equities team maintains a diversified mix of AI investments, assessing opportunities and risks company by company.
  • Lower U.S. Treasury yields or reduced bond issuance could support corporate bond prices, even without improving borrowers’ credit quality. Weaker growth could offset those benefits, making security selection important.

1. What would make the post-election backdrop more favorable for markets?

Our Multi-Asset Strategies & Solutions (MASS) team sees divided government as more likely to result in compromise rather than a complete policy reversal. Our positive outlook depends on meaningful relief from tariffs or global political tensions, alongside less stimulus from additional government spending or tax cuts. Lower tariffs could reduce company costs and support profit margins. But avoiding another tariff increase isn’t the same as cutting tariffs already in place.

De-escalation involving Iran could offer relief, but continued disruption or renewed escalation remains a meaningful risk. A durable agreement that improves energy flows could lower costs for consumers and energy-importing businesses while easing inflation pressure, though lower energy prices would weigh on energy producers’ earnings. If accompanied by a weaker U.S. dollar, those conditions could also support international and emerging-market assets. Continued disruption in the Strait of Hormuz or renewed escalation could instead keep oil prices elevated, sustaining inflation pressure and weighing on consumers and energy-sensitive businesses.

Our broader fixed income team does not expect the dollar’s initial decline to persist, while the investment grade credit team sees firm energy prices supporting bond issuers. These views reflect separate scenarios rather than a shared forecast for oil or the dollar.

See more: Beyond the Ballots: What Matters for Markets