Trump’s Trade School Idea Is a $3 Billion Winner

The president recently expressed his support for a great idea: investing an additional $3 billion in trade schools. That he suggested taking the money from scientific and medical research grants allocated to Harvard University — a counterproductive move unlikely to survive a court challenge — should not detract from the idea’s merit. Nor should it obscure the issue’s strong bipartisan appeal.

To be clear, the administration’s fight with Harvard and its Ivy League peers is a bad idea. One can criticize those schools for many things — in particular, their thoroughgoing failure to combat anti-Semitism in recent years — without obliterating research budgets at some of America’s most important academic institutions. One hopes the provocation was the point.

That said: If ever the president had an opportunity to unite Republicans and Democrats, greater support for career and technical education should be it.

More young Americans have been choosing such training in recent years — program enrollment is up about 20% since 2020 — and for good reason. High-quality programs can lead directly to well-paying jobs while allowing students to escape much of the debt that can come with attending a four-year college. As artificial intelligence intrudes on more areas of knowledge work, the appeal of these programs may quickly grow.

Yet too many programs are stuck in the past or otherwise not aligned to today’s job market, leading to wasted money for taxpayers and lost opportunities for students. That has been true at both community colleges and high schools. The country continues to need more mechanics, plumbers and welders, but increasingly, large numbers of vacancies are showing up in industries that technical schools haven’t traditionally emphasized, including health care, advanced manufacturing, renewable energy, information technology and other STEM fields.

Aligning education and training with job market trends could produce significant benefits for both companies and consumers, as well as for the American workforce, which could enjoy higher pay and greater mobility. Creating that alignment requires reform in four key areas.